Mohawks Know the Dark Side of
Bridges
by Darren Bonaparte
(Originally published in The
People's Voice, May 20, 2005)
They're long gone now, but there were once two
railway bridges connecting Cornwall Island to the American and Canadian
mainland. The Ottawa & New York Railway Bridge, as the two
spans were collectively known, seemed to have a curse on it right from
the beginning.
First the south span of the O&NY Railway Bridge
collapsed in October of 1898, killing 15 workers and seriously injuring
sixteen. In June of 1908, part of the north span gave way. This
happened less than a year after the infamous Quebec Bridge Disaster of
August, 1907, in which 73 ironworkers--33 from Kahnawake--met a
horrible end when the bridge they were working on suddenly failed and
plunged into the waters of the St. Lawrence River.
Sometimes just crossing a bridge can be dangerous,
as one Akwesasne family found out in 1915. We find their story in
the files of the Department of Indian Affairs, in the form of a letter
by the Indian Agent to his superiors in Ottawa.
I
have to inform you on behalf of Mitchell Oak, a member of the St. Regis
band of Indians #417 on the paylist, of the fact that on Monday evening
April 5th, instant, between the hours of seven and eight his daughter
Cecile, aged 10 years, was shot by one of the guards on duty at
Cornwall Isle, protecting the Canadian portion of the New York and
Ottawa bridge…
…It would
appear that Mrs. Oak accompanied by her two daughters, Cecile aged
about 10 years, and Margaret aged about 12 years, were returning to
their home at Cornwall, Ont. From the St. Regis village by way of
Cornwall Island, and as they intended to walk across the bridge, when
it is alleged that one of the guards without asking them to halt, fired
at them twice, the first shot going wild but the second shot striking
this poor innocent and harmless child in the front portion of the left
leg about 4” below the thigh bone.
After the
shooting, the girl was immediately taken to the General Hospital by one
of the guards, John Semo, Richard Semo and several others. The
bullet has been extracted and the girl is resting as well as can be
expected under the circumstances.
It is
stated that they were not challenged by the guard and that the only
intimation of danger was the firing in quick succession of two
shots. It would seem that the guard should have, after firing the
first shot, endeavoured to stop them before firing the second. At
the time of the shooting there were not any guards on the bridge nor
track, and here I may add that these guards had just arrived that
evening and were just arranging their camp when the shooting occurred.
The guard
who shot the girl was in the ditch, or at least on the side of the
track and the bridge was between him and the girl. It may also
state that these children do not speak English.
For years
it has been customary for the Indians to cross and recross this bridge,
in fact it has been always considered as a public highway and has on
either side of track a sidewalk protected on one side by wire.
Again last summer until this bridge was guarded the Indians were always
allowed the use of said bridge.
The Indians
were not aware of any guards being placed to protect this bridge as no
warning had been issued, nor posters placed in position as had
previously been done.
There were
12 guards present when the shooting occurred and does it not seem that
they could easily have stopped this poor harmless woman and two young
innocent children without maiming one and causing her days and nights
of suffering?
The Indian
agent, F. E. Taillon, requested that an inquest be called, and that the
guard be punished if found guilty of a crime. He also asked that
damages and hospital bills should be paid on behalf of the family,
which had five other kids besides Cecile (also known as Sarah) and
Margaret. Nancy Oak, the mother of the children, was the first to
testify when the military board of enquiry was held 4 days after the
shooting.
On
Monday night about 7.30 P.M. 5/4/15 I was returning from Cornwall
Island (St. Regis Church) with my two daughters Maggie aged 12 years
and Sarah aged 10 years and my baby in my arms.
When about
3 acres South side of N.Y.O. Railway Bridge, I heard two shots.
The last struck my little girl, she began to cry. She was struck
on thigh of left leg, Sarah 10 years old.
The
Soldiers were yelling, and I said wait a minute. They asked if
anyone was hurt, I said yes, my little girl. The soldiers then
took my little girl across, and sent for Dr. Monroe and she was taken
to General Hospital. Sarah was wheeling the baby carriage I asked
her if she heard anybody yelling she said No.
I had a
white hat on my head.
Major Hugh A. Cameron testified that he had just
inspected the guards and was returning to his quarters when
…I
heard a sentry challenge somebody saying loudly and distinctly, “Halt!
Who comes there, three times with a pause between each challenge.
We immediately retraced our steps, then we next heard the report of a
rifle, followed by two other shots.
His account was echoed by several other guards who
testified, including
the guard who fired the first shot, Private Joseph Tyo:
About
9.15 I heard somebody coming up the track, so I notified the other
sentry, I challenged them three times, got no answer, then I fired, and
I obeyed orders, they were as near as I could judge sixty yards away,
they were still advancing when I fired. Pte. Jarvo fired after me
then Col-Sergt yelled Cease Fire, and upon coming up asked what we were
shooting at. I told him I heard someone coming up the track, had
challenged them three times and got no answer then fired.
Private Charles Jarvo, who fired the shot that hit
the girl, echoed the
testimony of his comrades almost word for word. Both emphasized
how dark it was that night. The Board of Enquiry concluded the hearing
by finding
That
the said Sarah Oak, while in company with her mother and sister,
journeying from St. Regis via Cornwall Island to Cornwall town…was
wounded by a bullet, apparently fired by a duly posted sentry, and not
complying with the sentry’s order to halt,
We further
find that the sentries, in question, performed their duty, as
instructed, and under the circumstances were justified in firing upon
the suspected intruders.
Duncan Campbell Scott, the Deputy Superintendent
General of Indian
Affairs, advised the St. Regis Indian agent that in light of the
findings, no further action could be taken. He requested that any
expense associated with the girl’s hospitalization be forwarded to the
department for reimbursement.
In June of that year, the Treasury Board authorized
payment of $100 to Sarah Oak, to be issued by the Department of Indian
Affairs,
…as
compensation in respect to her suffering and any possible ill effects
which may result from her injury…
The Department of Indian Affairs’ notorious
bureaucracy then kicked in.
By the time the check actually reached Mohawk hands in 1921, about six
years after the shooting, poor Sarah had healed from her wounds, grown
up, gotten married, and died from an undisclosed illness. She
never saw a penny of the money meant to alleviate her suffering.
Next
in series:
